ESSAY
Beyond Gumnam Tareekh
Veiled behind long, thorny bushes and untrimmed grass, and surrounded by houses stacked onto one another, a four-sided domed kiosk showing faded red nanakshahi bricks casts a spell on those who wander into the streets of what once was a royal Mughal neighborhood in the north of Lahore. Its four archways invite towards multiple entry points, bemoaning a story forgotten to time.
Commonly referred to as the “unknown tomb”, some locals call it a mandir, while others think of it as a gumbad. What sounds like a paradox echoes the interwoven layers of Hindu, Muslim, and Sikh influences in Lahore. With no major architectural patterns left, it is difficult to discern its exact date and purpose of construction; a site for a historian’s conundrum.
Unlike most historical sites that remain walled off, their inner corners inaccessible to ordinary folk, this humble structure houses an ailing disabled person, whose neighbors pour household rubbish into the mandir/gumbad, despite being told not to do so several times by the authorities. People come inside, and without meeting the old man’s gaze, dump their trash. It does not stop here. People also steal his stuff.
Nonetheless, the old man thinks of this place as a castle, the only place that allows him residence because he cannot afford rent anymore. His wife used to work in people’s homes for the last fifteen to twenty years to pay rent. Now, she, too, had become too old to carry on the work. But his condition demanded he needed a room of his own, which their landlord did not allow. So the dumpster site near their rental house provided him with this roof. For him, this was God’s blessing, saving him from the wrath of the landlord. History did not evaporate from this place. It lives on, providing this old man with refuge.
This mandir/gumbad is in Begumpura, a small neighborhood created during the time of Mughal suhbahdars of Lahore, first Nawab Abdul Samad Khan, and then later his son Nawab Zakaria Khan under Shah Jahan’s rule in the eighteenth century. It is believed to have been founded by Begum Jan, Zakaria Khan’s mother. This compound’s gateway has a curved roof pavilion that offers a small glimpse into the past where this walled complex, now a low-income neighborhood for migrated families of Partition, once hosted Mughal royals.
This old man residing inside is part of that history; engagement with the mandir/gumbad would be incomplete without including his experience. While local people do not know about the Nawab’s history so much, nor about the Mughal significance of this area, they remain part of a similar historical continuity. In fact, people’s rupture with the past is also a type of relation they share with it. This relationship is an important part of this area’s history as it unfolded, one that is considered only for the books, the armchair, the flaneurs, but remains severed for the common people, those who live it every day. The common folk perhaps have never had access to the same history because they have never received history like the ones writing it. The exclusive conditions made to understand and be a part of history barricade it off for the common folk.
There is another way to understand this rupture, by observing two types of silences: one silence created by the absence in the archive, the other silence created by the chaos of noise so loud and complex that it becomes difficult to hear. The mess of everyday is the second silence. Hence, this rupture can be a connecting thread to understanding a history so complex that it falls outside the range of our hearing frequency.
In fact, people’s rupture with the past is also a type of relation they share with it.
A few streets across, towards the Begumpura gateway and near the Nawab’s Haveli, Lahore’s Khoji, a fitting title for the city’s local historian Faizan Naqvi, who has written and researched extensively on it, reveals that the graves of the Nawab’s family do not lie in the elaborate cemetery nearby, but are situated at the back side of the Haveli on the walkway. They remain without any gravestones or demarcations; people step onto them without knowing what lies underneath – a jolting metaphor for history.
History can fool us, and can even deceive those who spend long years engrossed in its power. Unlike the promise of the Enlightenment, while we might “dare to know”, our mortality means we cannot ever fully know. It is this acknowledgment that allows any genuine understanding. In other words, our limitation is our possibility.
History does not just speak to one person and close itself off for the rest. It is, in fact, spread out and reaches all. It moves constantly, always active and waiting for interpretation.
Located in the north of the Dai Anga Tomb in Begumpura, Saruwala Maqbara/Gumbad or Cyprus Tomb is the resting place of Begum Sharf-un-Nisa, the sister of Nawab Khan Bahadur, an Amir of Mughal Emperor Akbar. This place was built during her lifetime in the early eighteenth century. Begum Sharf-un-Nisa would come here every day, using a ladder to enter the room where she recited the Quran after her evening prayer. Following her recitations, she would go back to her home but would leave the Quran and her sword inside the Gumbad. She was also buried inside it along with her Quran and sword, as per her will.
Moved by Sharf-un-Nisa’s personality, Allama Iqbal wrote about her in Javid Nama:
She was all ecstasy and yearning, anguish and burning,
eyes and lamp to the governor of Panjab;
radiance of the family of Abd al-Samad,
her poverty is an image remaining eternally.
To cleanse her being wholly with the Koran,
not for one moment did she cease recitation;
at her side a double-edged sword, the Koran in her hand,
flesh, body, mind and soul drunken with God;
solitude with sword, Koran and prayer
O happy life, passed in supplication!1
Written as a eulogy, this passage pays homage to Sharf-un-Nisa’s memory. While the full poem has multiple meanings, especially the revitalization of Muslims, an often-ignored reading is that this is a tribute by him that cages her in tropes of modesty. More specifically, his ignorance of the multiple striking meanings associated with the sword reduces Sharf-un-Nisa’s complex womanhood. His focus remains on her daily recitations, without attending to what her sword reveals about her – and what it might mean for her – dimming the sharpness of her blades.
Who, then, should be trusted in this deluge of gumnam tareekh?
History is a noun derived from a verb, an action of engaging with the past. Reading, writing, talking, imagining, yearning, and regretting – all are various ways of engagement. Taking inspiration from the German philosopher and hermeneut, Hans-Georg Gadamer, history is a dialogue. Like a conversation, it can take various forms. It can be arduous or straightforward, violent or reassuring. These opposing, often paradoxical, ways of interactions between one time-space and another combine to form the push and pull, the motion that creates the spark of what we call history.
More specifically, his ignorance of the multiple striking meanings associated with the sword reduces Sharf-un-Nisa’s complex womanhood.
It leaves clues in front of us. History is not just in the archive (the historian’s favorite) but felt in the everyday. We must piece together these fragments by genuine engagement with the past, unlike the orientalists who wrote about India without ever visiting; their “history” was a figment of their racist imagination whose reverberations continue till today.
While some might consider mere walking or surveying sufficient to know a place its history, it is not enough. This figure of the flaneur is an individualistic entity. Perhaps it is constructed by those who never became entangled in the messy space. His view constantly abstracts from the environment observations that are often reductive, at best, if not entirely mistaken. The flaneur, in some sense, is a silent figure, refusing dialogue and imposing a constructed meaning from his (mostly male) imagination. Our relationship with how we think of history must move beyond a mere imposition of familiar language. We must open ourselves up, make ourselves available for dialogue, and feel it as an active force shaping our everyday.
As a child, I remember walking nonstop in the grounds of Baghbanpura College in Mughalpura where my mother taught, as the only other option was to sit in her classes. I also remember when my father took me to see Mughal monuments in the area as we waited for my mother’s class to end. Back then, I used to stay quiet, which made me into a silent observer of history. Growing up as a woman in Pakistan comes with its baggage of challenges, but the power of history is stronger. If one is lucky, it pulls us so close there is no escape from it. Doing a project in the same locality after over a decade made me reflect on the existential nature of history, where there were no options, besides listening to the pasts’ silences, screams, ruptures, echoes, and stories.
History is not just in the archive (the historian’s favorite) but felt in the everyday.
We ought to give our attention to history, listen to it in its own language, and converse with it, instead of walking over it. For the past does not need saving. It is not dying. We are the mortal ones, while the past remains immortal, a ghost that silently shapes us. It may communicate with us through the language of memory, a language that travels through silence. And being in conversation with the past might not make us better, but it will make us whole.
Musfira Khurshid is a researcher and journalist, with an interest in local and transnational histories, their social and political worlds, and afterlives.

